๐ฉ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ณ, ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฒ๐น๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฑ? ๐๐ต๐ฟ “๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ผฬ๐ป๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐”? ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ต๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐-๐๐?
Of course, the idea is charming. Everything I know or need to think about, want to remember or could forget – in future there will be an AI that doesn’t forget anything, takes care of things and assists me.
I would like to get rid of zอwอeอiอ อAอsอpอeอkอtอeอ:
1) Have you ever had a “๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐๐ฒ” ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ผฬ๐ป๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป / ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ป “๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐๐ฒ๐ป” ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ผฬ๐ป๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป? It sometimes takes years to build up 100% trust, to have the procedures, preferences and experience to really remind you of everything, to arrange everything and not to forget anything. This is often not the assistant’s fault, but your own. In other words, you also have to teach your AI assistant this first. “๐๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ & ๐ฅ๐๐ป” ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ป๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ธ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป.
2) ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ป๐ถ๐ธ has been instilled in us by the fascinatingly calculable engineering and computer science of the last 100 years. This is why many people tend to “believe” an AI first. However, ๐๐ ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ (!) ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ต๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ป๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฒ is more. Nothing that could be reproducibly explained by mathematical algorithms. AI has no “feeling” for errors and can “invent” a solution in case of doubt instead of saying, I did something wrong or I don’t know. You could also call this “lying” in the boss/assistant relationship.
๐จฬ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐จ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ต๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ธ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ธ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต.
Only the sensible, guided, planned and accompanied use of AI can lead to genuine assistance functions. AI assistants that are left alone with this task will not be able to meet expectations.
And this is precisely the great challenge of knowledge management in the age of AI!