๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ผ-๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต!
And it’s not because of potentially violent students, a dangerous commute, any cyber issues with the teaching/learning environment, the challenge of using the coffee machine properly or the risk of becoming addicted to the smell of whiteboard markers (although the latter should not be underestimated)…
It is located at ๐๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐๐ณ๐๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐จ-๐๐-๐๐ฐ๐๐, ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐๐ป๐ด๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐๐๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ณ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐บ๐ถ๐ “๐ต๐ผ๐ต๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ผ” ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ป๐ฒ๐.
๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐บ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ?
We have all experienced that AI systems sometimes spit out some pretty nonsense. If, for example, chat GPT were to be used to create uncontrolled teaching material, exams and slides, then such hallucinations could become learned knowledge and mislead a large number of learners – this must not happen, of course.
This is why we at educational institutions have to consider the use of AI separately and are subject to (much) higher documentation and transparency obligations than most other companies. We need to demand much more sensitivity from our professors when dealing with AI systems. This also applies to our colleagues in administration.
๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ป ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ “๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ” ๐ฑ๐ฬ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ ๐ฬ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป!
#informatikersindcool#aiact#educationisimportant
P.S.: By the way, this applies to education of any kind – publishers, schools, even kindergartens, but also some bloggers or TV programs can be classified in this category…
